Read random sequence variant file HL_RandomMotifSequences_20.fasta
Timestamp 20-Oct-2021 11:30:39
Finding core edit distance of 1200 sequences against  310 models
Checked edit distance for   50 models so far, total time   0.3923 minutes
Checked edit distance for  100 models so far, total time   0.3738 minutes
Checked edit distance for  150 models so far, total time   0.6717 minutes
Checked edit distance for  200 models so far, total time   0.6083 minutes
Checked edit distance for  250 models so far, total time   0.5916 minutes
Checked edit distance for  300 models so far, total time   0.5729 minutes
Parsing 1200 sequences against  310 models
Parsed against   50 models so far, total time   5.0197 minutes
Parsed against  100 models so far, total time   2.8554 minutes
Parsed against  150 models so far, total time   2.1372 minutes
Parsed against  200 models so far, total time   1.7748 minutes
Parsed against  250 models so far, total time   1.6149 minutes
Parsed against  300 models so far, total time   1.5185 minutes

ans =

    12

UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.22, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.29, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
UGGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -8.00, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.87, deficit  2.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
ACAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.97, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UUUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.97, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.47, deficit  0.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.29, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GAGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCCG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GCGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -8.33, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.74, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.51, deficit  1.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CAUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.73, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
UGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90197.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-s35                             
CCUCG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.38, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CCCGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -5.62, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
AUUCU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.26, deficit  1.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUCUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.00, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GCGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AGGAU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.36, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CGGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUAAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.30, deficit  1.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CAUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.73, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCCUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -5.09, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GAUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_56387.1,  5 NTs,                 AUUUU,score      -6.25, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55                 
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUGG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.12, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
AGUGU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CUGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
CUGGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.87, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.97, deficit  0.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.14, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GUUAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.40, deficit  0.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.00, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GUCAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -2.79, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UGAAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.97, deficit  0.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UGUAA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.37, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CUAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CACUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUUCG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.95, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUCCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.13, deficit  3.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.57, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
CUGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUGCG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.57, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CAUAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.02, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.86, deficit  1.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GUUCGC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_34974.1,  6 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -3.90, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.34, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55                 
GUCUGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -7.06, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
AUUCAU 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -5.82, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.77, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
CUCCUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.00, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUUAG 1  Matches 35; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -5.06, deficit  1.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
UGAAAA 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.18, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UGAUAA 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.21, deficit  0.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
AAAGCU 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.13, deficit  6.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGCUUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -4.81, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.16, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -6.00, deficit  2.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -6.02, deficit  1.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
GAAAUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.43, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
UAUAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -7.06, deficit  2.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.59, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CAUAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -7.49, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
UUGAAA 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -9.51, deficit  7.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.57, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AUAAAU 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.27, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
GAUCCC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -4.01, deficit  1.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGGCAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -4.77, deficit  0.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
CCGUCG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UUGAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.81, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GGAAUC 1  Matches 38; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.66, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGCAUC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -8.02, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAAUG 1  Matches 35; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.56, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
AGGUGU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.41, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGUGGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAUGCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_30541.1,  5 NTs,                CAUUCG,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F                             
GUACCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.91, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GGACAC 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.29, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.96, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.86, deficit  1.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GCGUGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -6.20, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CCUUGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -5.58, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUUAGC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -4.91, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UGGGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.35, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GAAAUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.43, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
UGUGAA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.65, deficit  0.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CAAUCG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -4.34, deficit  0.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCAUG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.81, deficit  2.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.92, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GAACUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_41285.1,  5 NTs,                GAACUC,score      -4.39, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-s35                               
AAGGUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -6.72, deficit  1.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUUCGAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -5.77, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GCUGAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -7.94, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUACCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -9.30, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAUUUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.25, deficit  2.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CUGUUUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.69, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
UGUGGAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.40, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CAAUCAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.60, deficit  2.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
CGCCCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.20, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GACAAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.18, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
AUGGUCU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.20, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
GGCAAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.90, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUAAAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -4.50, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
UGAACGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -7.59, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CUUUAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score     -11.44, deficit  9.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.17, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
UUUGAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -8.11, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGCCGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.67, deficit  0.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.31, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UUCUUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_33612.1,  6 NTs,               CUUUUGG,score      -8.77, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55                 
GGGUCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -12.09, deficit  4.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CAGAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.76, deficit  3.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UUAGGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -6.05, deficit  0.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGCACUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.57, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCAACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -5.87, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GAAUCCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -5.87, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UAACGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.20, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGAGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.51, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
UGCUGUA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -7.37, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
CUACUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -6.76, deficit  2.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CUGCAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.30, deficit  2.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGGGGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -6.84, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UGUUUAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score     -10.16, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
ACUCGAU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -5.99, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CUCCGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -5.24, deficit  1.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CGAUAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.05, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.09, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GAAGAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.17, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
UUUCCUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -5.34, deficit -0.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
GGCAUGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.97, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
GAGGUCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score     -10.20, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGAGUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.41, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CAAACGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.01, deficit  2.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
CACACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.16, deficit  2.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGGUUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -5.22, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
AUUCUCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -5.73, deficit  1.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CUCUUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -6.26, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CGACGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.46, deficit  0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AGGAAAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.33, deficit  1.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGAUUUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.15, deficit  2.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GAGAGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -9.87, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CCCAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -7.66, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UCUAACA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -7.15, deficit  1.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGGUUGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.69, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CGGAUCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.79, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CGUCAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.73, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CACAAAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.86, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUCAGUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -6.76, deficit  2.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GAAUUGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -7.98, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CUUCUACG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.15, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GUUACUAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.65, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
CGUGUUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -9.79, deficit  4.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
CGAAAUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -10.38, deficit  5.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUCAGAGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.00, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CGAUUAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -8.06, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
AGGUAAAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -9.08, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
UGAGAGAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.30, deficit  4.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
UGUAAUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -8.62, deficit  2.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUGAACAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -9.21, deficit  3.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUCAGUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -12.20, deficit  5.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
GUUCGGUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -11.80, deficit  5.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
CGCAGAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.66, deficit  1.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUGAGAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.34, deficit  1.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GAAACUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_23481.4,  7 NTs,              GAAACAUC,score      -3.55, deficit  1.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35               
UGCUUGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score     -12.87, deficit  8.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
UGAUCUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -9.02, deficit  4.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GUCCUUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score     -11.90, deficit  5.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
GAAAAAGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.35, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAAGCUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -12.66, deficit  3.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
UGAUCAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -8.23, deficit  5.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
GUUAAGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -6.00, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
GGAAGUCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -7.64, deficit  4.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UAAGAUGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.90, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
UAAAGACA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -5.01, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
UGUUAUAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.24, deficit  1.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CAAAGAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.08, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
UCCAAGGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.52, deficit  0.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUUGAAAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -6.00, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
GCCGCAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.35, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GCGAAACC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -8.78, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
AAGACUCU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -8.75, deficit  4.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CAUAAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -7.18, deficit  1.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GCAAAACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -7.21, deficit  2.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
GUAAAUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -8.17, deficit  3.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CGAGGUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.57, deficit  3.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGAAACUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -6.61, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAACAAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -7.98, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
AAUAAGCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -4.97, deficit  0.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
UUGCAAGA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -7.79, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUAGAAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -5.03, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GUGUGACC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score     -10.79, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
GGAAGGCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -9.40, deficit  5.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GGAAGAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -5.55, deficit  1.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.28, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAGGAAGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -6.71, deficit  1.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUCUCCACC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -8.75, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CGCCUAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -8.97, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CGUGUUACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50537.2,  8 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -8.50, deficit  4.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35                 
UUUUAGAAA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score      -9.92, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
GUUGACUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -8.42, deficit  3.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.16, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAGAGUAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -8.44, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CCGAUAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -7.51, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
CUGGACUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -10.94, deficit  5.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUGAGAUUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -7.29, deficit  0.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CGCAGAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -12.99, deficit  7.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
UAUAGGUUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -11.89, deficit  5.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUCAAAGUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -7.09, deficit  1.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
UGGAUGGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -8.91, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
GUUGAAACC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score     -10.17, deficit  2.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
CGGCGAAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -10.27, deficit  1.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AUGUGGUCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score     -10.11, deficit  3.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
GUAGGAGUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -9.01, deficit  5.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CUAUGGAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -7.96, deficit  1.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
CAAUACUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -8.88, deficit  3.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUUCUAGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score      -9.29, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAGAAAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.71, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
AAGGAAAGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -8.36, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CGGCUAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -6.77, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.36, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GAUUGCGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score     -11.28, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CUUGAAGAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -8.62, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
GCUCGAGCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.87, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
AUUUGGUGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score      -8.56, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.78, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGAGAUAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -6.91, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUUUAAAUC 1  Matches 20; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -5.80, deficit  2.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CGCCUUGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -13.46, deficit  5.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
GGAUUGGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score      -9.28, deficit  3.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUGUUCUCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score     -10.12, deficit  4.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
GGUUAUCAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -9.26, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAUCCUCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.77, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GGCCUUUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -14.04, deficit  6.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CCUUAUGAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score      -6.65, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CUUCUGCGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.20, deficit  5.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
AGAAUGGGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -11.72, deficit  6.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GCGAAGGGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score      -9.73, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
UUGCUUGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score     -10.74, deficit  3.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
UGCUUCAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.74, deficit  6.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCCGAGUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -10.06, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.92, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
UGAGGGGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -10.46, deficit  1.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CUUCUCAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -8.68, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGGGAUUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.38, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAUAUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -11.26, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUGUUUCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.67, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUUUAAAUC 1  Matches 20; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -5.80, deficit  2.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CGUCGCUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.52, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GUUGCAAGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score     -12.55, deficit  6.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
CGAAGAACCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.55, deficit  5.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCAACCUGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -13.24, deficit  6.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GGGCUUUUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.74, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
UGACGUCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -11.03, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.28, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
UUUCAACGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -14.49, deficit  6.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
UGGAUUGCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score      -9.90, deficit  3.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGGGAAUGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.46, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GGGUAAAGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -11.18, deficit  3.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUCUCUUCUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.11, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUUGAAGAGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -11.88, deficit  6.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCUUCAUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score      -9.08, deficit  1.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
AGAACGGUCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score     -12.05, deficit  5.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CGUCUGCGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -11.96, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
CUUAUAGACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -15.19, deficit  7.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GGAAAGGUAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -10.50, deficit  4.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUCCAGAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -10.44, deficit  1.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CUCCUACUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -11.88, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
UCAGAGAACA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -8.72, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UGAAGAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -10.93, deficit  4.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
GUGAAGCAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -12.99, deficit  7.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUUUUAGCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -13.61, deficit  9.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCAAAUCGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.86, deficit  1.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGGUUGGCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score     -12.08, deficit  5.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
AUAGAUGUUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -11.24, deficit  6.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
CCUCACAUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.57, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
UGGAUUCUUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.55, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AUUUGUCUUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score     -10.59, deficit  4.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
CUUAAGGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -10.25, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUAAGAAGUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CUAGCCGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score     -14.56, deficit  8.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGACAGUGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -13.18, deficit  5.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
CGAAAUCAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -9.37, deficit  3.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GCCGUUUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.60, deficit  3.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.80, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
UCGAAGAUUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.83, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
UGAAUCGAAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.80, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AACCGUGCUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.48, deficit  7.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CCCAAGUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -12.00, deficit  6.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CAGAUGCGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -11.96, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
GGUUCCAUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.81, deficit  1.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUUUCUCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score      -9.03, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AUAACUAAUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -10.19, deficit  5.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
UGCUCAUUGA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.38, deficit  2.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCGGCGACAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -11.93, deficit  4.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AGGGCCCGGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -14.46, deficit  6.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.77, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
AAAGUGAAUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -10.67, deficit  4.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGGUCCUAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.56, deficit  3.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAAUUGACCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -14.25, deficit  3.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.30, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
GAAACUCGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -15.69, deficit 10.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GGAAAAAAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -11.80, deficit  4.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAGAUGAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -11.70, deficit  2.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.10, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
CGACAUUAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -16.21, deficit  8.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGGUUCGUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -13.68, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.16, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
CUAUCAUCGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -12.98, deficit  7.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
CGCGAUAUGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.63, deficit  7.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.77, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUGAGAACAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -10.54, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
AUUCCACCUAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -12.80, deficit  5.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.03, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAACUCAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.06, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
AUUUAGUGAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -11.49, deficit  5.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCGCGACAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -11.85, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
GGUCGAAGUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.08, deficit  4.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GAGAGGAAUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.12, deficit  6.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.12, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGAUCAAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -13.28, deficit  5.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUAGAUUUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -13.24, deficit  8.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.22, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCGUGUCUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -12.52, deficit  3.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
UGUUAAAGAGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -11.67, deficit  4.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAAAACGAACA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -12.81, deficit  5.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.44, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGGAGAAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.05, deficit  6.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.46, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUUAAACAAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -10.15, deficit  3.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
UCACGCUACUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -16.35, deficit  8.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
AGCUUGCACCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -12.65, deficit  7.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.69, ed 99, 4 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
CGUUGAGUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -11.69, deficit  4.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCACUAUAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -14.61, deficit  9.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GGUGGAAUGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -12.98, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CGUGUUCUAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.47, deficit  7.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.56, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGGGAACCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -12.95, deficit  8.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
GUCCUUAGGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -12.87, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
ACUUCAUCUGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -10.96, deficit  1.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUUCCAAUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score      -9.34, deficit  1.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
UUGAGAUAGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -11.91, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CCAUUAAGGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -12.70, deficit  5.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.39, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGAAGCGACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -11.79, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.30, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAUGCAAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -10.25, deficit  4.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GACCAAAGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -12.27, deficit  5.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGAAGAAUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.85, deficit  6.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GAGGUGGGAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -13.62, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-F                               
GCGCCUAGGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_35188.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score      -9.62, deficit  3.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s33-F                       
CUAGGCAUGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -12.92, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GGGCAAAUCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -11.67, deficit  4.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.62, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGGUAACGGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -10.16, deficit  2.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAUACUUCUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -16.65, deficit  7.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.55, ed 99, 4 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
GCUAAAAGACUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -11.31, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.41, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
UAAAAUUCUUGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.13, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.22, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CGUAAAAAACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -11.29, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.48, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
GUAGGUGAAAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -17.03, deficit  8.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CAUUCUUGAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.40, deficit  4.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUGAAACUAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -15.59, deficit  8.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GACCUAGUCCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58446.1, 12 NTs,        GACCUAGAUCACCC,score     -16.97, deficit  9.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35 
CGCAAAAUUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.88, deficit 10.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CACAAACUCUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.80, deficit  5.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.90, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGGCAGAAGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.20, deficit  5.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UCUUGGUCAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -16.44, deficit  7.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGGAUGAAUGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -17.14, deficit  9.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
CCUCUAAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.21, deficit  6.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.70, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
AGAUGCACUGGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.32, deficit  6.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.67, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
GGUGGAGAUCUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.76, deficit  6.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.13, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAAAGAAAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -11.62, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AAAGCAGAGUCGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.19, deficit  4.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.10, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCUUCUAAAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -12.87, deficit  5.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.81, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
CGUGAGAGAUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.58, deficit  8.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.02, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
GGCGCGUCCUGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -13.27, deficit  4.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.33, ed 99, 5 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
GAAAAAAACAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -12.60, deficit  5.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
AGAAGUCUGAAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -11.71, deficit  3.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.03, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
GGUGGGAUUGUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20714.1, 11 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -18.65, deficit 10.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUCAGGGAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -14.13, deficit  5.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CAGGUGGAUGUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -13.41, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.95, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAAAUGAGAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.57, deficit 10.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCAGUAAGGCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -14.74, deficit  3.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
CGAGCCAGUAUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -15.73, deficit  1.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.74, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
GGAAGAAAGAAUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -18.64, deficit  4.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.25, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
CAAGGGUAAAUGCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12710.1, 15 NTs,      GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC,score     -16.36, deficit  4.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.96, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCAGUUUGAUUUUCAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_82866.1, 17 NTs,     CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG,score     -19.63, deficit  8.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.83, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35
GGAAAAACACUUGAAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90257.1, 15 NTs,    CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG,score     -19.39, deficit  7.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.26, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 81.2000	 68.7000	4
5	100.0000	 91.0000	 47.2000	23
6	100.0000	 86.1000	 45.6000	60
7	 99.9000	 50.4000	 13.1000	51
8	 99.4000	 27.6000	  3.9000	46
9	 99.4000	 19.3000	  1.8000	68
10	 95.6000	  8.6000	  0.2000	41
11	 83.1000	  4.1000	  0.0000	42
12	 44.2000	  0.6000	  0.0000	23
13	 18.3000	  0.4000	  0.0000	12
14	  6.8000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  2.4000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.3000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.7000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.3000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.2000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  86 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence 179 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence 189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence 189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 191 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence 191 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 191 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 197 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 197 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence 200 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence 201 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 208 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence 208 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 216 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 218 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence 221 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 221 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 222 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence 224 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 224 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 226 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 226 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence 230 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 230 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 232 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 233 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 234 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 241 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 241 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 241 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 241 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 241 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 243 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 244 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 244 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 245 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 246 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 252 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence 255 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 255 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 261 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 263 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 265 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 268 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 269 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 271 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 271 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 272 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 273 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 276 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 277 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 278 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 278 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 278 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 280 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 281 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 289 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 291 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 293 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 294 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 297 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 298 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 300 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 301 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 305 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 305 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 315 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 319 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 321 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 327 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 330 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 334 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 342 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 346 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 352 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 353 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 357 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 362 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 378 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 390 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 396 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 430 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 432 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 433 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 437 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 438 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 438 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 444 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 445 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 447 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 451 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 481 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 482 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 510 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 550 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 555 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 573 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 606 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 607 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 612 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 612 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 618 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 622 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 632 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 632 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 656 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 698 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 701 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 717 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 717 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 756 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 756 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 868 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 879 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 883 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 936 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 950 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 1036 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 1067 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 1082 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 1087 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 1128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 1168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 1185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 1245 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 1256 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 1420 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 1487 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 1624 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 1882 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.4833%
Number of models giving false positives is 301 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     7.52
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.39
